Simple, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly web analytics.
- AGPL-3.0
- Elixir
- Actively maintained
Analytics comparison
Pick Plausible for a polished, privacy-friendly dashboard built on ClickHouse; pick Umami for an MIT-licensed, Postgres-only analytics app that is simpler to host.
Both are open source and run on your own server. Below: a side-by-side of license, stack and features, live GitHub activity, and our verdict on who should pick which.
Simple, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly web analytics.
Simple, fast, privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics.
Head-to-head
Hand-checked differences first, then live numbers from GitHub, refreshed with every catalog update.
| Aspect | ||
|---|---|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 (Community Edition); some features are cloud-only. | MIT. |
| Language/stack | Elixir (Phoenix) with ClickHouse for events and PostgreSQL for app data. | TypeScript (Next.js) with PostgreSQL. |
| Hardware needs | Docs recommend at least 2 GB RAM, and the CPU must support SSE 4.2 or NEON for ClickHouse. | Runs alongside a single PostgreSQL database on a small VPS. |
| Self-hosted features | Funnels, ecommerce revenue goals, SSO and the sites API are not in Community Edition. | Self-hosted build includes all open-source features, including events and reports. |
| Privacy | Cookieless, no personal data stored. | Cookieless, no personal data stored. |
| GitHub stars | 29,323 | 39,188 |
| Commits, last 12 months | 545 | 1,087 |
| Last commit | Oct 6, 2026 | Oct 6, 2026 |
| Latest release | v3.2.1May 15, 2026 | v3.4.0Sep 17, 2026 |
| Main language | Elixir | TypeScript |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| Repository | plausible/analytics | umami-software/umami |
Swipe the table sideways to see both apps. GitHub figures come from the public API. Highlighted values are the higher of the two.
Both are cookieless, privacy-friendly Google Analytics alternatives with a clean single-page dashboard. Plausible Community Edition is a mature choice if you can run ClickHouse, though funnels and ecommerce revenue goals are cloud-only. Umami is easier to host on a small server with just PostgreSQL, carries a permissive MIT license and supports multiple websites and teams out of the box.
Best for
Polished privacy-first analytics for content sites.
Best for
Simple, permissively licensed analytics on a small server.
Not sure yet? Spin up a small VPS or a managed instance, try both for a week, and keep the one that fits.
Sponsored links: we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you. It never affects rankings.
Yes. It is free under AGPL-3.0, but marketing funnels, ecommerce revenue goals, SSO and the sites API are reserved for the paid cloud.
Current Umami releases support PostgreSQL only, per the official install docs. Older versions supported MySQL.
Both are designed to work without cookies or personal data, which is why many sites run them without a consent banner. Check with your own legal advice for your jurisdiction.
Umami has 39,188 GitHub stars against 29,323 for Plausible Analytics. Over the last twelve months Plausible Analytics received 545 commits and Umami received 1,087, so Umami is the more actively developed of the two right now. Stars measure interest, not fit, so weigh them against the differences above.
Keep comparing
Pick Umami for a lightweight, cookieless dashboard that is easy to host; pick Matomo if you need a full Google Analytics replacement with deep reports, goals and plugins.
Pick Plausible for a simple, cookieless dashboard that anyone on your team can read; pick Matomo if you need ecommerce reports, segments and the depth of Google Analytics.
Pick Metabase for the easiest setup and a query builder non-technical users love; pick Apache Superset for SQL-first teams that need many chart types and a permissive Apache license.
Pick Metabase for an actively developed BI tool with a visual query builder; pick Redash if your team writes SQL and wants a lightweight, BSD-licensed query and dashboard tool.