Skip to content
appsgit

Monitoring & Status Pages comparison

Uptime Kuma vs Gatus: which should you self-host in 2026?

Pick Uptime Kuma for a polished web UI where you add monitors and status pages by clicking; pick Gatus for config-as-code health checks defined in YAML and stored in Git.

Both are open source and run on your own server. Below: a side-by-side of license, stack and features, live GitHub activity, and our verdict on who should pick which.

Uptime Kuma

louislam/uptime-kuma

92k GitHub starsLast commit Oct 6, 2026

Easy-to-use self-hosted uptime monitor with status pages and 90+ notification channels.

  • MIT
  • JavaScript
  • Docker
  • Actively maintained

Gatus

TwiN/gatus

12k GitHub starsLast commit Oct 5, 2026

Developer-oriented health dashboard and status page configured with simple YAML.

  • Apache-2.0
  • Go
  • Docker
  • Actively maintained

Head-to-head

Uptime Kuma vs Gatus, side by side

Hand-checked differences first, then live numbers from GitHub, refreshed with every catalog update.

Uptime Kuma compared with Gatus
AspectUptime KumaGatus
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Language/stackJavaScript on Node.js, Vue frontendGo, single binary
ConfigurationEverything configured in the web UIYAML config file; no UI editing
DatabaseSQLite, with MariaDB supported from version 2In-memory by default, SQLite or PostgreSQL for persistence
Standout featuresMultiple status pages, 90+ notification services, many monitor typesConditions on status, body and response time, external endpoints, deep-merged config files
GitHub stars92,14912,246
Commits, last 12 months1,359143
Last commitOct 6, 2026Oct 5, 2026
Latest release2.5.5Sep 16, 2026v5.37.0Sep 24, 2026
Main languageJavaScriptGo
Official Docker imageYesYes
Repositorylouislam/uptime-kumaTwiN/gatus

Swipe the table sideways to see both apps. GitHub figures come from the public API. Highlighted values are the higher of the two.

Verdict

Uptime Kuma is the most approachable self-hosted uptime monitor, with a friendly dashboard and a long list of notification services. Gatus suits DevOps teams who want checks in version control, with conditions on status code, response time and body content.

Best for

Choose Uptime Kuma for

Homelabs and small teams who prefer managing monitors in a web UI.

Best for

Choose Gatus for

DevOps teams who want monitors as YAML in Git.

FAQ

Uptime Kuma vs Gatus: FAQ

Still curious? Email info@appsgit.com.

Does Gatus have a web UI?

Yes, Gatus has a dashboard that shows endpoint health and history, but monitors are defined in its YAML config rather than in the UI.

Can Uptime Kuma be configured as code?

Not natively. Monitors live in its database and are managed through the UI, so Gatus is the better fit for GitOps workflows.

Which supports more alert channels?

Uptime Kuma lists 90+ notification services. Gatus supports the common ones such as Slack, Teams, PagerDuty and Discord plus custom webhooks.

Which is more popular on GitHub, Uptime Kuma or Gatus?

Uptime Kuma has 92,149 GitHub stars against 12,246 for Gatus. Over the last twelve months Uptime Kuma received 1,359 commits and Gatus received 143, so Uptime Kuma is the more actively developed of the two right now. Stars measure interest, not fit, so weigh them against the differences above.