HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy.
- MIT
- Go
- Docker
- Actively maintained
Web Servers & Reverse Proxies comparison
Pick Traefik for label-based, automatic routing of Docker and Kubernetes services; pick Nginx Proxy Manager if you want to add proxy hosts and SSL certificates through a simple web UI.
Both are open source and run on your own server. Below: a side-by-side of license, stack and features, live GitHub activity, and our verdict on who should pick which.
HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy.
Docker container for managing Nginx proxy hosts with a simple, powerful interface.
Head-to-head
Hand-checked differences first, then live numbers from GitHub, refreshed with every catalog update.
| Aspect | ||
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language/stack | Go, single binary | Node.js admin app on top of NGINX (OpenResty) |
| Architecture | Providers (Docker, Kubernetes, files) feed routes dynamically, no reloads | Web UI generates NGINX config; data stored in SQLite or MySQL/MariaDB |
| Standout features | Automatic Let's Encrypt, middlewares, TCP/UDP routing, metrics and tracing | Web UI for hosts, redirects, streams, access lists and Let's Encrypt certificates |
| Learning curve | Steeper: routers, services and middlewares in labels or YAML | Low: everything is done in the browser |
| GitHub stars | 65,081 | 34,325 |
| Commits, last 12 months | 846 | 798 |
| Last commit | Oct 5, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 |
| Latest release | v3.7.13Sep 4, 2026 | v2.16.0Sep 24, 2026 |
| Main language | Go | TypeScript |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| Repository | traefik/traefik | NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager |
Swipe the table sideways to see both apps. GitHub figures come from the public API. Highlighted values are the higher of the two.
Traefik is the better fit for dynamic container setups where routes should appear automatically from Docker labels or Kubernetes resources. Nginx Proxy Manager is the friendliest option for homelabs: click to add a host, request a Let's Encrypt certificate and you are done, without touching config files.
Best for
Container platforms that need automatic service discovery.
Best for
Homelab users who want a point-and-click reverse proxy.
Not sure yet? Spin up a small VPS or a managed instance, try both for a week, and keep the one that fits.
Sponsored links: we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you. It never affects rankings.
Yes, at first. Traefik needs you to learn its labels and configuration model, while Nginx Proxy Manager is configured entirely through a web UI.
Yes. Both request and renew Let's Encrypt certificates automatically, including DNS challenge support for wildcard certificates.
No. You add each proxy host manually in the UI. Traefik reads Docker labels and creates routes as containers start.
Traefik has 65,081 GitHub stars against 34,325 for Nginx Proxy Manager. Over the last twelve months Traefik received 846 commits and Nginx Proxy Manager received 798, so Traefik is the more actively developed of the two right now. Stars measure interest, not fit, so weigh them against the differences above.
Keep comparing
Pick Caddy for the simplest config file with automatic HTTPS and a built-in file server; pick Traefik for dynamic routing that follows Docker and Kubernetes labels.
Pick Caddy for automatic HTTPS and a short, readable config; pick NGINX for maximum control, a huge ecosystem of tutorials and proven high-traffic performance.