Skip to content
appsgit

Low-code & Backend comparison

PocketBase vs Supabase: which should you self-host in 2026?

Pick PocketBase for a tiny single-binary backend with SQLite, auth and realtime; pick Supabase for a full Postgres platform with auth, storage, edge functions and room to scale.

Both are open source and run on your own server. Below: a side-by-side of license, stack and features, live GitHub activity, and our verdict on who should pick which.

PocketBase

pocketbase/pocketbase

61k GitHub starsLast commit Oct 2, 2026

Backend for your next SaaS and Mobile app in one file.

  • MIT
  • Go
  • Docker
  • Actively maintained

Supabase

supabase/supabase

111k GitHub starsLast commit Oct 6, 2026

Postgres development platform with auth, realtime, storage and edge functions, the open-source Firebase alternative.

  • Apache-2.0
  • TypeScript
  • Docker
  • Actively maintained

Head-to-head

PocketBase vs Supabase, side by side

Hand-checked differences first, then live numbers from GitHub, refreshed with every catalog update.

PocketBase compared with Supabase
AspectPocketBaseSupabase
LicenseMITApache-2.0
ArchitectureSingle Go executable with embedded SQLiteMany services (Postgres, PostgREST, Auth, Realtime, Storage, Studio) run via Docker Compose
DatabaseSQLitePostgreSQL with row-level security and extensions
ExtensibilityUse as a Go framework or add JavaScript hooksPostgres functions, triggers and Deno-based Edge Functions
MaturityPre-1.0: the README warns backward compatibility is not guaranteed before v1.0.0Stable platform also sold as a managed cloud
Hardware needsRuns comfortably on very small serversNeeds noticeably more memory to run the full set of containers
GitHub stars61,293111,147
Commits, last 12 months5006,123
Last commitOct 2, 2026Oct 6, 2026
Latest releasev0.40.4Sep 12, 2026v1.26.08Aug 7, 2026
Main languageGoTypeScript
Official Docker imageYesYes
Repositorypocketbase/pocketbasesupabase/supabase

Swipe the table sideways to see both apps. GitHub figures come from the public API. Highlighted values are the higher of the two.

Verdict

PocketBase is ideal for side projects, prototypes and small apps: one executable gives you a database, auth, file storage, realtime and an admin UI, and it runs on the smallest VPS. Supabase is the stronger choice when you need real PostgreSQL, row-level security, many services and a team-ready platform, at the cost of a much heavier self-hosted stack.

Best for

Choose PocketBase for

Solo developers and small apps that want a backend in one file.

Best for

Choose Supabase for

Teams that need full PostgreSQL and a Firebase-style platform.

FAQ

PocketBase vs Supabase: FAQ

Still curious? Email info@appsgit.com.

Can PocketBase scale?

It handles a lot on a single server because SQLite is fast, but it does not scale horizontally. If you outgrow one machine, a Postgres-based platform like Supabase is easier to grow.

Is self-hosted Supabase the same as Supabase Cloud?

Mostly. The self-hosted Docker setup includes the core services and Studio, but some platform features such as multiple projects per dashboard and managed backups are cloud-only.

Which has realtime updates?

Both. PocketBase offers realtime subscriptions on collections, and Supabase Realtime streams Postgres changes, broadcast and presence.

Which is more popular on GitHub, PocketBase or Supabase?

Supabase has 111,147 GitHub stars against 61,293 for PocketBase. Over the last twelve months PocketBase received 500 commits and Supabase received 6,123, so Supabase is the more actively developed of the two right now. Stars measure interest, not fit, so weigh them against the differences above.