Skip to content
appsgit

Database Management comparison

NocoDB vs Teable: which should you self-host in 2026?

Pick NocoDB for a mature Airtable-style UI, mainly for internal use given its source-available license; pick Teable for an AGPL Postgres-native spreadsheet with direct SQL access.

Both are open source and run on your own server. Below: a side-by-side of license, stack and features, live GitHub activity, and our verdict on who should pick which.

NocoDB

nocodb/nocodb

65k GitHub starsLast commit Oct 6, 2026

No-code platform that turns any database into a smart spreadsheet (alternative to Airtable and Smartsheet).

  • SUL-1.0
  • TypeScript
  • Docker
  • Actively maintained

Teable

teableio/teable

22k GitHub starsLast commit Oct 6, 2026

Next-gen Airtable alternative with a Postgres-backed spreadsheet UI.

  • TypeScript
  • Docker
  • Actively maintained

Head-to-head

NocoDB vs Teable, side by side

Hand-checked differences first, then live numbers from GitHub, refreshed with every catalog update.

NocoDB compared with Teable
AspectNocoDBTeable
LicenseSustainable Use License 1.0: source available, internal business or non-commercial use onlyAGPL-3.0 core apps, MIT SDK packages, brand assets excluded
Language/stackTypeScript (Node.js) with a Vue front endTypeScript with a NestJS backend and Next.js front end
DatabaseIts own metadata DB (SQLite or PostgreSQL); can also connect external databasesPostgreSQL, with each table stored as a real Postgres table
Standout featuresGrid, gallery, kanban, form and calendar views, REST APIs, webhooksDirect SQL access to your data, real-time collaboration, AI features
HostingSingle Docker container to startDocker Compose with PostgreSQL and Redis recommended
GitHub stars65,19721,858
Commits, last 12 months6,6361,156
Last commitOct 6, 2026Oct 6, 2026
Latest release2026.09.1Sep 29, 2026release.2026-10-02T04-02-20Z.3278Oct 2, 2026
Main languageTypeScriptTypeScript
Official Docker imageYesYes
Repositorynocodb/nocodbteableio/teable

Swipe the table sideways to see both apps. GitHub figures come from the public API. Highlighted values are the higher of the two.

Verdict

NocoDB is the more established Airtable alternative, with many views, forms and automations, but its Sustainable Use License limits it to internal business, personal or non-commercial use. Teable stores every table as real PostgreSQL tables, so you can query your data with SQL and handle large tables, and its core is AGPL-3.0. Choose Teable if licensing matters, NocoDB if you want the longer track record.

Best for

Choose NocoDB for

Internal teams wanting a feature-rich Airtable replacement.

Best for

Choose Teable for

Teams that want spreadsheet UX on Postgres with an OSI license.

FAQ

NocoDB vs Teable: FAQ

Still curious? Email info@appsgit.com.

Is NocoDB still open source?

Not under an OSI definition. Its repository now uses the Sustainable Use License, which allows internal business, personal and non-commercial use but restricts offering it commercially to others.

Can I query Teable data with SQL?

Yes. Teable keeps your tables in PostgreSQL, so you can connect a SQL client or BI tool to the same data.

Which is the better Baserow alternative?

Both cover the same Airtable-style use case. Teable is closer to Baserow in spirit with a Postgres-first design, while NocoDB offers the broader feature set.

Which is more popular on GitHub, NocoDB or Teable?

NocoDB has 65,197 GitHub stars against 21,858 for Teable. Over the last twelve months NocoDB received 6,636 commits and Teable received 1,156, so NocoDB is the more actively developed of the two right now. Stars measure interest, not fit, so weigh them against the differences above.